Umul Khasanah, J. Junaedi, Ismail Nasar, Muhammad Haris, Berman Hutahaean, R. Rudiansyah, Angga Muchlis Al-Rachmat, Tantan Gunawan, Achmad Yusuf, Tri Astindari, Saltanat Meiramova
This research aims to evaluate the curriculum that has been carried out in the previous academic year at a university. The curriculum evaluation process in this research is carried out to assist universities in making decisions to choose alternative course components that are most prioritized to be developed in the next academic year. Alternative data on course components used are learning objectives, learning materials, learning strategies, evaluation of learning outcomes that are commonly used as guidelines for academic lecture activities in higher education academics. The assessment criteria used are basic principles such as relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, and continuity. The method used for decision making is the MOORA method. The results of this study concluded that the most prioritized course component alternative to be developed in the next academic year is alternative A3 (Learning Strategy). © 2026 Author(s).
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya, Surabaya, Indonesia; Institut Agama Islam Darul Da'wah Wal-Irsyad Polewali Mandar, Indonesia; Universitas Katolik indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia; Institut Pesantren Sunan Drajat Lamongan, Lamongan, Indonesia; Universitas Katolik Santo Thomas, Medan, Indonesia; Faculty of Cultural Sciences Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia; BPSDM Provinsi Jawa Barat, Bandung, Indonesia; Universitas Yudharta Pasuruan, Pasuruan, Indonesia; STKIP PGRI Situbondo, Situbondo, Indonesia; A.K. Kussayinov Eurasian Humanities Institute, Astana, Kazakhstan